Strengthening GLBA Safeguards in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Guide
- Cybersecurity Consultant Brent Gallo
- Nov 18
- 6 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Colleges and universities face increasing pressure to protect financial and personal data. If your institution participates in federal student aid programs, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Safeguards Rule is not just a best practice; it is an expectation from regulators and the Department of Education.
At Hire A Cyber Pro, we recently completed a comprehensive GLBA Safeguards assessment for a U.S. college. This engagement included a governance review, hands-on technical testing, and a readiness scorecard aligned directly to 16 C.F.R. §314.4.
Assessment Results: A Snapshot of Current Readiness
The results may sound familiar if you work in higher education:
Security maturity sat between Developing and Defined on a five-stage scale.
Overall GLBA readiness was roughly 35% implemented across required program elements.
The college had several important strengths but also faced a clear 12–24 month journey to achieve a defensible, audit-ready GLBA posture.
Get the Full White Paper at the bottom of this post.
Positive Indicators: What We Found
The good news is that many higher-ed IT teams are doing a lot with limited resources. In our assessment, we observed:
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for remote access already in place.
Microsoft Defender and Intune deployed across much of the environment.
A motivated IT staff that clearly cares about security.
Identifying Gaps: Areas for Improvement
However, GLBA Safeguards compliance goes beyond having a few good tools. It requires a documented, measurable program. The college’s biggest gaps will sound familiar to many campuses:
No formally designated “Qualified Individual” (QI) with clear authority and responsibilities for the information security program.
No written risk-assessment methodology or risk register—assessments were ad hoc and undocumented.
Weak identity and Active Directory hygiene:
- Short password lengths.
- Thousands of inactive accounts.
- Privileged accounts with non-expiring or very old passwords.
- Legacy protocols like SMBv1 still enabled.
Incomplete encryption: not all sensitive databases or data flows were encrypted at rest and in transit.
Email and endpoint protections not fully enforced: preset security policies disabled, inconsistent enrollment in EOP/Defender, gaps in Intune/JAMF enforcement.
No formal third-party risk management (TPRM) program: vendors weren’t consistently inventoried, tiered, or assessed.
No continuous testing and monitoring cadence: penetration testing happened once, but there were no recurring scans, config reviews, or steering meetings.
These aren’t unusual problems, but if left unaddressed, they create real risks to student financial data, Title IV funding, and the institution’s reputation.
Understanding GLBA’s Safeguards Rule
The GLBA’s Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. §314.4) outlines what an information security program must include. In practical terms, we see eight building blocks every college needs:
Governance & Accountability (§314.4(a))
Designate a Qualified Individual (QI) with written authority, alternates, and clear reporting lines.
Document roles and responsibilities in your Information Security Program (ISP) and RACI.
Risk Assessment (§314.4(b))
Use a defined method (e.g., NIST-style) that ties threats, likelihood, impact, and control strength together.
Maintain a living risk register with owners and business impact—review it at least quarterly.
Safeguard Design & Implementation (§314.4(c))
Modern identity standards (12–15+ character passwords/passphrases; stale account cleanup; privileged credential lifecycle).
Enforce strong encryption (TLS 1.2+ everywhere; encryption at rest on sensitive databases with FIPS-validated crypto).
Harden email, endpoints, M365, Intune, and JAMF using CIS/STIG-aligned baselines.
Testing & Monitoring (§314.4(d))
Monthly internal and external vulnerability scanning.
Quarterly configuration reviews.
Annual penetration testing, with findings feeding the risk register and patch process.
Personnel Training (§314.4(e))
Organization-wide awareness training plus role-based training for admins and security staff.
Track completion and continuing education—not just “did we send the video?”
Service Provider Oversight (§314.4(f))
A structured TPRM program: vendor inventory, risk tiering, due-diligence questionnaires, and contract language for security and incident notification.
Program Adjustments (§314.4(g))
A quarterly Security Steering Committee that reviews risks, incidents, test results, and technology changes—and documents decisions.
Annual Written Report (§314.4(i))
A board-level report from the QI summarizing risk posture, control testing, TPRM, incidents, and the roadmap for next year.
Most institutions have pieces of this puzzle. GLBA expects you to put them together into a coherent, repeatable program.
A Practical Roadmap: 0–24 Months to Stronger GLBA Safeguards
From our college engagement, we built a three-phase roadmap that any higher-ed institution can adapt.
Phase 1: Quick Wins (0–90 Days)
Focus on changes that immediately reduce risk and demonstrate progress:
Governance:
- Issue a formal QI designation and update your ISP documentation.
Identity & Access:
- Enforce 12–15+ character passwords or passphrases.
- Disable SMBv1 and other legacy protocols.
- Expire/reset non-expiring privileged accounts and clean up long-inactive user objects.
Email & Endpoint Security:
- Enable Microsoft 365 Standard or Strict preset security policies across all users.
- Turn on external sender tagging and basic anti-spoof protections.
- Enable the Defender for Endpoint connector, disk-encryption policies, and OS/update enforcement.
Network & Exposure:
- Migrate SNMP to v3.
- Disable deprecated TLS/ciphers and remove default web pages; add essential security headers.
Risk & Vulnerability Management:
- Stand up a basic risk register.
- Standardize a monthly vulnerability-management cadence.
These actions alone close a huge portion of the most easily exploited attack paths.
Phase 2: Near-Term Build-Out (3–9 Months)
Once the basics are in motion, move to programmatic safeguards:
Complete encryption at rest on key databases and ensure TLS 1.2+ end-to-end for critical integrations.
Deploy CIS/STIG baselines for servers, endpoints, network, and perimeter devices.
Establish a Third-Party Risk Management program: vendor inventory, tiering, questionnaires/evidence, and updated contracts.
Implement continuous monitoring: monthly scanning, quarterly configs, and annual pen-test cycles.
Mature your phishing and awareness program with regular simulations and role-specific training.
Phase 3: Long-Term Modernization (9–24 Months)
Finally, tackle structural improvements and deeper resilience:
Modernize or retire legacy operating systems and services; upgrade domain controllers.
Implement stronger identity governance (just-in-time/just-enough admin, or PAM where appropriate).
Fully integrate JAMF with Apple Business Manager; enable JAMF Security Compliance and standardize macOS/iOS profiles.
Expand logging and telemetry into a SIEM; build incident-response playbooks and conduct annual tabletop exercises.
Operationalize your Annual Written Report from the QI to leadership.
By the end of this roadmap, GLBA Safeguards implementation isn’t just a project; it becomes part of how your institution operates.
The Risks of Leaving GLBA Gaps Unresolved
Leaving GLBA gaps unresolved isn’t just a compliance problem. In our college engagement, the risks were clear:
Regulatory & Funding Exposure
- Sustained non-conformance with §314.4 can invite FTC scrutiny and Department of Education attention.
- For Title IV institutions, that can translate into corrective action plans, increased audit burden, or even risk to program eligibility.
Financial Impact
- Incident response, legal support, notifications, credit monitoring, and downtime often cost far more than proactive remediation.
- Insurers increasingly demand MFA, EDR, encryption, and monitoring—without them, premiums rise and coverage can be restricted.
Operational Disruption
- Compromised credentials and lateral movement through legacy services can disrupt registration, payroll, and learning systems for days or weeks.
Privacy & Reputation
- Unauthorized access to student and parent financial records is a trust event, not just a log entry.
Third-Party Cascade Risk
- Without TPRM, a vendor’s compromise can quickly become your compromise—especially for SIS/ERP, payment, or hosted LMS platforms.
The flip side: a well-run GLBA program strengthens resilience, simplifies audits, and often improves your cyber-insurance options.
How Hire A Cyber Pro Helps Colleges and Universities
Hire A Cyber Pro is a veteran-owned cybersecurity firm that works with public and private institutions to build GLBA-aligned, evidence-driven security programs.
Our Focus: Three Key Outcomes
Discover (Assessment)
GLBA Safeguards Rule assessments aligned to §314.4.
Risk assessments and technical testing (vulnerability assessments, penetration testing).
Configuration reviews for M365, Intune, Defender, JAMF, and Active Directory.
Reduce (Remediation)
Identity and AD cleanup, password and MFA hardening.
Encryption strategy and implementation for data at rest and in transit.
CIS/STIG baselines for servers, endpoints, network, and firewalls.
Vulnerability management cadence and continuous monitoring.
Prove (Assurance)
Evidence packs for auditors, boards, regulators, and insurers.
KPI dashboards and quarterly steering materials.
Support for the QI’s Annual Written Report to leadership.
Engagements can be fixed-scope assessments, phased remediation programs, or ongoing vCISO/QI support, often in a co-managed model alongside your existing IT team and MSP.
Ready to Benchmark Your GLBA Safeguards Program?
If you’re a President, CFO, CISO, or Director of IT in higher education and you’re unsure where your GLBA Safeguards program really stands, we’d be happy to help you find out.
Whether you need a one-time assessment, a 24-month roadmap, or a partner to serve as your GLBA Qualified Individual, Hire A Cyber Pro can help you move from “we think we’re okay” to measured, documented, and defensible.
Let’s talk about where your program is today and where you want it to be in the next 12–24 months. Reach out to Hire A Cyber Pro. Schedule your free consultation.
Get the full white paper here.